Not known Details About h4831 vs h4831sc

Not known Details About h4831 vs h4831sc

Blog Article

I'm a true fan of the H4831 powder. I get good velocity and precision out of any caliber I have tried out it in. From the twenty five-06 up to the 338 it really is my drop by powder of selection. I consider all types of powders when Doing work up loads, though the H4831 usually seems to appear out on leading for accuracy and velocity when the situation is of your 06 course or bigger.

These are exactly the same issue, but H4831 sc is Slash shorter so it'll pack into a situation less difficult then the conventional, and occasionally like our 7mm rem mag it allows us to include much more powder then just the conventional H4831.

What's the main difference? Compression. Without the Extraordinary/hefty compression affiliated with the extensive grain 7828, the tension curve was altered and the load fell apart.

Minnesota H4831SC is my go to inside the 7mm Rem Mag, but I am preserving the minor I have still left for tumble 2021. I'd commence lower and do the job your way up, based on what load data you take a look at for this combo the min/max loads are all around the board.

My expertise is that the SC and SSC loaded to the same weight since the long Minimize exhibits a decreased velocity.

Considering the fact that there doesn't seem like any "official" Load Data out there for this Load, can some of you deliver a place to begin with this combination and matters to think about when Operating this Load up?

I don't like to work up a load employing 1 wide range h4831 vs h4831sc of powder and after that have to operate up all over again due to the fact I operate out and have to begin employing a new whole lot selection.

If you've some heavier .224" bullets, you could find a load that works OK with the 4831. The bullets I attempted which were in excess of 70 grains would not stabilize in my rifle, which had the conventional 14" twist. The 70-grain Speer was the most significant bullet that might stabilize, but it really did that superbly. It is a funny-hunting bullet with a rounded nose profile, but it shoots wonderful and kills effectively. Deer out to about a hundred and fifty yards al went down immediately with rib-cage hits.

Presently utilizing IMR 4831 within a 300WSM, and see the H4831sc is a popular choice for this caliber and yields a bit more velocity. Apart from it staying shorter Slash, exactly what is the primary difference in both of these powders, and will I change to H4831sc?

In addition, it goes on to claim h4831sc that because of the fshorter grains, that load density might be a little bit bigger.

I desired a bit much more myself so I went ahead and grabbed the 8lb jug to get protected for a while (and have lots of a similar lot of powder).

NBTs h4831sc load data or Hornady VMax, but Have a very minimal source of Varget, in addition to a lot much more accessible H4831SC. I shoot 55 gr. loads Nearly exclusively, since that is certainly exactly what the rifles shoot the top.

Southwest Idaho I tried H4831sc in my three hundred WM but experienced far better speed and precision with H1000. I would fairly make use of a slower burning powder with 215g tablets.

This seems like a superb place to divulge a little more info on Hodgdon, H4831 especially...I when experienced a pound of H4831SC sit about the shelf for quite a few several years. It had been ordered before Hodgdon commenced publicizing the "Extraordinary" line of powders, of which the H4831s are a component.